<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universe Models For Recursive Data Part I: Introduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dagira.com/2010/06/16/universe-models-for-recursive-data-part-i-introduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dagira.com/2010/06/16/universe-models-for-recursive-data-part-i-introduction/</link>
	<description>...you are in a twisty maze of passageways, all different...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:17:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rey_havoc</title>
		<link>http://www.dagira.com/2010/06/16/universe-models-for-recursive-data-part-i-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-1665</link>
		<dc:creator>rey_havoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dagira.com/?p=282#comment-1665</guid>
		<description>hi Dave, eager to know when part 4 and 5 getting published. your examples and explaination are fantastic as always. 
very thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Dave, eager to know when part 4 and 5 getting published. your examples and explaination are fantastic as always.<br />
very thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.dagira.com/2010/06/16/universe-models-for-recursive-data-part-i-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dagira.com/?p=282#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to part 2 !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to part 2 !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rathbun</title>
		<link>http://www.dagira.com/2010/06/16/universe-models-for-recursive-data-part-i-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rathbun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dagira.com/?p=282#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Hi, Andreas, I have part 2 and part 3 done, they are pending publication once I go back and do a final review and edit as needed. Parts 4 and 5 are in draft mode but essentially complete. Part 6 is only an abstract at this point. Lots of material coming, including scripts to build and populate the data used for the demonstrations that I used during my presentation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Andreas, I have part 2 and part 3 done, they are pending publication once I go back and do a final review and edit as needed. Parts 4 and 5 are in draft mode but essentially complete. Part 6 is only an abstract at this point. Lots of material coming, including scripts to build and populate the data used for the demonstrations that I used during my presentation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andreas (Xeradox)</title>
		<link>http://www.dagira.com/2010/06/16/universe-models-for-recursive-data-part-i-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>Andreas (Xeradox)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 08:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dagira.com/?p=282#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>Dave, nice post, but of course I am looking forward to part 2 and 3 and ...
This is one of the things where traditional SQL falls flat on its nose IMHO, and I have to admit that OLAP seems the way to go here.
Also the way hierarchies are represented in Web Intelligence XI 3.x is not optimal, I am looking forward to Pioneer (Advanaced Analysis) and Aurora (SAP BOE XI 4) in that respect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, nice post, but of course I am looking forward to part 2 and 3 and &#8230;<br />
This is one of the things where traditional SQL falls flat on its nose IMHO, and I have to admit that OLAP seems the way to go here.<br />
Also the way hierarchies are represented in Web Intelligence XI 3.x is not optimal, I am looking forward to Pioneer (Advanaced Analysis) and Aurora (SAP BOE XI 4) in that respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

