<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universe Parameter: Eval Without Parenthesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/</link>
	<description>...you are in a twisty maze of passageways, all different...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:36:59 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rathbun</title>
		<link>http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rathbun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>I create / use a table-based (DUAL or otherwise, depending on the database) &quot;ALL&quot; object for my LOV queries as well. I had a nice &quot;discusssion&quot; :-D with some folks a few months ago about the relative cost of using hard-coded SQL versus taking the time to do things in a way that I would call correct. In my opinion, there is going to have to be a very pressing argument for hard-coding SQL, meaning absolutely no other way to accomplish the task, before I will consider doing it in the universe.

Thanks for your comment, welcome to my blog. 8-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I create / use a table-based (DUAL or otherwise, depending on the database) &#8220;ALL&#8221; object for my LOV queries as well. I had a nice &#8220;discusssion&#8221; <img src='http://www.dagira.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' />  with some folks a few months ago about the relative cost of using hard-coded SQL versus taking the time to do things in a way that I would call correct. In my opinion, there is going to have to be a very pressing argument for hard-coding SQL, meaning absolutely no other way to accomplish the task, before I will consider doing it in the universe.</p>
<p>Thanks for your comment, welcome to my blog. <img src='http://www.dagira.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ottoman</title>
		<link>http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Ottoman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/#comment-115</guid>
		<description>I tried this once in an established universe &amp; came unstuck with complex oracle calculations

a slight digression... I have a dummy &#039;ALL&#039; object from th DUAL table in the universe and use this in a union query for the edited LOVs, better than hardcoding the SQL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried this once in an established universe &amp; came unstuck with complex oracle calculations</p>
<p>a slight digression&#8230; I have a dummy &#8216;ALL&#8217; object from th DUAL table in the universe and use this in a union query for the edited LOVs, better than hardcoding the SQL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Oh, I like that.  I have to use @Select all the time, and the extra () always bothered me (and the DBAs!).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I like that.  I have to use @Select all the time, and the extra () always bothered me (and the DBAs!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek Chladny</title>
		<link>http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek Chladny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>No, I have not used it. After reading your blog I was interested whether the same parameter exists in BO 6.5. And yes, it is there :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I have not used it. After reading your blog I was interested whether the same parameter exists in BO 6.5. And yes, it is there <img src='http://www.dagira.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Rathbun</title>
		<link>http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rathbun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Good to know, thanks.

Were you aware of it before? Had you used it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know, thanks.</p>
<p>Were you aware of it before? Had you used it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek Chladny</title>
		<link>http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/comment-page-1/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek Chladny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 15:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dagira.com/2007/10/01/eval-without-parenthesis/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Just FYI: The same parameter exists in BO 6.5.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just FYI: The same parameter exists in BO 6.5.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
